Over Float
Float is de visuele teamplanner voor de moderne teams van tegenwoordig. Het helpt je bij te houden wie er waar en wanneer aan werkt.
Klaar om de spreadsheets te dumpen?
Verminder de chaos in resourceplanning met Float.
Afbeeldingen
Twijfels over Float?
Vergelijk met een populair alternatief
Beginprijs
Prijsopties
Functies
Integraties
Gebruiksgemak
Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding
Klantenservice
Alternatieven
Hub Planner
Slack
When I Work
Visio
Reviews
Heb je Float al?
Softwarekopers hebben je hulp nodig! Productreviews helpen anderen om goede beslissingen te nemen.
- Sector: Computersoftware
- Bedrijfsgrootte: 51-200 werknemers
- Dagelijks 6-12 maanden lang gebruikt
-
Bron van de reviewer
Totaalscore
- Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding
- Gebruiksgemak
- Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling 8.0 /10
Beautifully simple and easy to use
Beoordeeld op 26/1/2019
Float is a product I like using, and I wish some of its features and UX elements were in the other...
Float is a product I like using, and I wish some of its features and UX elements were in the other software that I use! We use Synergist for job and project management, but Float for scheduling because it UX is so much better than Synergist's scheduler tool.
Pluspunten
Float's user interface and logic are inspirational. They have made the activity of coordinating multiple resources on multiple projects about as easy as it can be. They have paid a lot of attention to usability, efficient use of screen real estate and simple navigation. However the killer feature is the intuitive yet clever way that searching and data navigation work. All searching and filtering is done using a single search field, which offers indexed word search on pretty much everything including tags. There is also a well-worked out protocol for handling union and intersect searches.
Minpunten
The only real bugbear is that any user that can enter data into the system can define new values for any field. It isn't possible to centrally control lists such as task names, clients, job descriptions etc. This means that if you have more than one person using the system, very quickly you get different versions of the same thing being defined (e.g. job roles being slightly different) which makes it difficult to analyse across records. Not a dealbreaker, but I do think it should be possible to lock down lists of values. Also it would be good if you could zoom out the view a little more - if you're dealing with more than a dozen resources/projects.
- Sector: Managementconsulting
- Bedrijfsgrootte: 51-200 werknemers
- Dagelijks 1+ jaar lang gebruikt
-
Bron van de reviewer
Totaalscore
- Gebruiksgemak
- Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling 9.0 /10
Great for
Beoordeeld op 31/8/2023
Pluspunten
How visual and easy it makes talent scheduling for our client services business! It's really intuitive in terms of its UX/UI and means that the information is shareable and understandable by everyone. It's actually created positive reliance for the business where it's become the single source of truth about who is working on which project/ away on hols and for how long, so that teams can effectively plan the best use of people. Especially as we work on multiple projects under the same client account, the tags are super useful as while we might be working for Client X, project A and project C might have completely different briefs and people scheduled on them to complete.
Minpunten
Probably some of the toggling features when you try to filter people across multiple departments.. It's not a massive issue, but one I am struggling to nail.
- Sector: Marketing en reclame
- Bedrijfsgrootte: 11-50 werknemers
- Wekelijks 6-12 maanden lang gebruikt
-
Bron van de reviewer
Totaalscore
- Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding
- Gebruiksgemak
- Klantenondersteuning
- Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling 6.0 /10
Feels overly complicated
Beoordeeld op 31/8/2023
Pluspunten
I enjoy the ease to add and archive employees
Minpunten
I feel like it is overly-complicated and difficult to spread hours across resources / projects, and the reporting it confusing. It also doesn't allow you to add pass thru costs to a project seamlessly.
Overwogen alternatieven
ForecastRedenen om voor Float te kiezen
Company decision / costOvergestapt van
ScreendragonRedenen om over te stappen op Float
Unclear.- Sector: Public relations en communicatie
- Bedrijfsgrootte: 1.001-5.000 werknemers
- Dagelijks 6-12 maanden lang gebruikt
-
Bron van de reviewer
Totaalscore
- Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding
- Gebruiksgemak
- Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling 9.0 /10
Makes capacity juggling so much easier
Beoordeeld op 22/8/2023
Pluspunten
The tool has a simple overview, visually similar to already known calendars. This means that you don't need any time to familiarize yourself with it. Just click and add entries.If you work with many different customers, you can create them once and then easily add individual projects within these customer folders.I especially like the fact that I can tell my clients apart right at first glance using the Color Coding feature. But when I need more information, I can also click on the entries and have access to the job number, the available budget, and any other information that might be available.Thanks Float - you make my daily work so much easier :-)
Minpunten
What could be improved:Currently, when I enter vacation, my projects in the same time frame just disappear from the schedule. This is quite inconvenient and should be fixed. It would be more practical to at least be warned and transfer the projects individually to someone else from the team, or be able to specify vacation substitutions so that the projects are automatically transferred.Also, it would be great if you could duplicate blockers via copy & paste. The split tool is often a bit impractical to use.
- Sector: Civiele techniek
- Bedrijfsgrootte: 5.001-10.000 werknemers
- Wekelijks 2+ jaar lang gebruikt
-
Bron van de reviewer
Totaalscore
- Gebruiksgemak
- Klantenondersteuning
- Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling 8.0 /10
Positive resource management tool
Beoordeeld op 28/8/2023
Pluspunten
Easy to use and share across different users
Minpunten
Adding more people to the team difficult or limited licensestracking budget adding leave and leave alternatives
Float - Veelgestelde vragen
Hieronder zie je enkele veelgestelde vragen over Float.V. Welke prijsmodellen heeft Float te bieden?
Float kent de volgende prijsmodellen:
- Vanaf: US$ 7,50/maand
- Prijsmodel: Gratis versie, Abonnement
- Gratis proef: Beschikbaar
V. Wat zijn de typische gebruikers van Float?
Float heeft de volgende typische klanten:
11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000
V. Welke talen worden door Float ondersteund?
Float ondersteunt de volgende talen:
Engels
V. Biedt Float ondersteuning voor mobiele apparaten?
Float ondersteunt de volgende apparaten:
Android (mobiel), iPhone (mobiel), iPad (mobiel)
V. Met welke andere apps kan Float worden geïntegreerd?
Float kan worden geïntegreerd met de volgende toepassingen:
Asana, Google Calendar, Jira, Microsoft Outlook, Okta, OneLogin, QuickBooks, Slack, Teamwork, Trello, WorkflowMax, Zapier
V. Welke mate van ondersteuning heeft Float te bieden?
Float biedt de volgende ondersteuningsopties:
E-mail/helpdesk, Veelgestelde vragen/forum, Kennisbank, 24/7 (contact met medewerker), Chatten
Gerelateerde categorieën
Bekijk alle softwarecategorieën die gevonden zijn voor Float.
- Workforce management software
- Afspraken software
- Taakbeheer software
- Personeelsplanning software
- Planning software
- Agenda software
- Resource planning software
- Urenregistratie software
- Reclamebureau software
- Project management tools
- Project portfolio management software
- Display advertising software
- Project tracking software
- Software voor strategische planning
- Project management software voor de non-profitsector
- Project planning software
