--- description: Gedetailleerde beoordelingen over SimScale: functies, prijzen, gebruiksgemak en scores. Met een duidelijk overzicht van de plus- en minpunten. Vergelijk SimScale met soortgelijke producten dankzij GetApp België. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: SimScale reviews, prijzen en scores | GetApp België 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startpagina](/) > [Simulatiesoftware](/directory/146/simulation/software) > [SimScale](/software/105393/simscale) # SimScale Canonical: https://www.getapp.be/software/105393/simscale Pagina: 1 / 7\ Volgende: [Volgende pagina](https://www.getapp.be/software/105393/simscale?page=2) > SimScale is een cloudgebaseerd simulatieplatform dat toegang biedt tot FEA- en CFD-simulatie via een standaardwebbrowser voor elke ingenieur en ontwerper ter wereld. SimScale wordt geleverd als SaaS en is toegankelijk via een jaarlijks abonnement, zonder speciale hardware, installatie of onderhoud. > > Oordeel: score van **4.5/5** door 140 gebruikers. Hoge score voor **Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling**. ----- ## Snelle statistieken en scores | Metriek | Beoordelen | Details | | **In totaal** | **4.5/5** | 140 Reviews | | Gebruiksgemak | 4.3/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Klantenondersteuning | 4.7/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding | 4.5/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Functies | 4.1/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Aanbevelingspercentage | 90% | (9/10 Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling) | ## Over de leverancier - **Bedrijf**: SimScale - **Locatie**: München, Duitsland - **Opgericht**: 2012 ## Commerciële context - **Beginprijs**: US$ 0,00 - **Prijsmodel**: (Gratis versie beschikbaar) (Gratis proefversie) - **Doelgroep**: Zelfstandig ondernemer, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementatie en platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop) - **Ondersteunde talen**: Engels - **Beschikbare landen**: Australië, Brazilië, Canada, China, Denemarken, Duitsland, Finland, Frankrijk, Ierland, India, Israël, Italië, Japan, Mexico, Nederland, Noorwegen, Oostenrijk, Qatar, Saoedi-Arabië, Singapore en 6 meer ## Functies - 3D-imaging - API - Animatie - Bewegingsmodellering - Burgerlijk - Doorlopende modellering - Dynamische modellering - Gegevens importeren en exporteren - Gegevensvisualisatie - Mechanisch - Mechatronica - Meerdere projecten - Modellering en simulatie - Ontwerpanalyse - Ontwerpbeheer - Ontwerpmodellering - Prognoses - Projectsjablonen - Rapportage en analyse - Samenwerkingstools ## Integraties (4 in totaal) - Autodesk CFD - CFturbo - Onshape - RhinoCAM ## Ondersteuningsopties - E-mail/helpdesk - Veelgestelde vragen/forum - Kennisbank - Telefonische ondersteuning - Chatten ## Categorie - [Simulatiesoftware](https://www.getapp.be/directory/146/simulation/software) ## Gerelateerde categorieën - [Simulatiesoftware](https://www.getapp.be/directory/146/simulation/software) - [BIM-software](https://www.getapp.be/directory/1199/bim/software) - [3D-CAD Software](https://www.getapp.be/directory/1433/3d-cad/software) - [CAD-software voor ingenieurs](https://www.getapp.be/directory/1207/engineering-cad/software) ## Alternatieven 1. [Autodesk Fusion](https://www.getapp.be/software/9530/fusion-360) — 4.5/5 (268 reviews) 2. [CATIA](https://www.getapp.be/software/122059/catia) — 4.6/5 (223 reviews) 3. [Acumatica Cloud ERP](https://www.getapp.be/software/44/acumatica-cloud-erp) — 4.4/5 (243 reviews) 4. [Fishbowl](https://www.getapp.be/software/101989/fishbowl) — 4.2/5 (1098 reviews) 5. [MRPeasy](https://www.getapp.be/software/102417/mrpeasy) — 4.5/5 (163 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Simscale Review" — 3.0/5 > **Biagio** | *4 juni 2021* | Luchtvaart(maatschappijen) | Aanbevelingsscore: 9.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: I like the fact that it allows to do a lot of different things. It has a wide range of applications in different branch of engineering, furthermore it has a lot od support. > > **Minpunten**: maybe, the website is a little bit confusing, and the materials in some case is not updated up to day. > > Great experience for me, I-ve been using for cfd simulations. ----- ### "SimScale User Experience" — 5.0/5 > **Ajith** | *1 december 2020* | Nutsbedrijven | Aanbevelingsscore: 10.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: EASE OF USE: I used it for compressible flow fluid simulations. It is very easy to setup and run a simulation in SimScale and analyze the output. SimsScale GUI is excellent. You can specify specify forces and moments and/or area averages to monitor statistics across specific faces of objects and also obtain statistics using post processing simulation results using cutting planes and particle traces. EASE of SETUP: Because all computations are on the cloud you can use any computer with reasonable power to run SimScale using a web browser. Further you can submit many simulation runs which runs in the back ground on the cloud. SUPPORT AND DOCUMENTATION: SimScale provides excellent library of on-line tutorials that enables you to self learn. They also provide unlimited access to a very competent, patient and helpful team of consultants free of charge to provide assistance with simple and complex issues. EASE of LEARNING: You don't need to be an expert on Computational Fluid Dynamics to use SimScale. Having a basic understanding of CFD will suffice. I used the books recommended by SimScale to self learn CFD before using SimScale for increasingly complex simulations including Turbine simulations. Although I do have a Civil engineering background with graduate studies in Operations Research I did not have deep expertise in fluid mechanics and CFD before I got started. Between tutorials and assistance of SimScale consultants you can learn very fast. > > **Minpunten**: SimScale user experience is fundamentally very good. I only have minor issues. One feature I would really like to see in SimScale is to have the ability to specify surface area averages on a cross section created by an arbitrary cutting plane. Currently you can do that only on specific faces of a imported CAD object. For example inlets, outlets or surfaces. By defining a surface area average you can also see how statistics across that area change as a function of iterations. Currently only way to get this information for non-surfaces is by post processing simulation data using cutting planes. This requires more work and takes time. Also SimScale can be somewhat slow to paint the screens because of large amounts of data involved. Another area of improvement is to provide more tutorials and documentation as to how to improve the mesh quality. Currently what is available is some what limited. > > Excellent product at a reasonable price. With a professional subscription you get privacy for your data and a fixed amount of core hours that can be used for simulations. As you need you can buy more core hours at a very reasonable cost. Also, by controlling the number of cores (using simulation setup) you can manage the consumption of core hours. If you let the software automatically select the number of cores it can get quite expensive in terms of usage of core hours. Also, tutorials and consultants make all the difference in terms of speed of learning. Customer service provided by the consultants in terms of responsiveness, quality and depth is outstanding. I have never experience better service in my experience of working 25 years in the software development industry. ----- ### "Simscale for CFD modeling HVAC Design" — 3.0/5 > **Joper** | *23 oktober 2023* | Machine- en installatiebouw | Aanbevelingsscore: 10.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: Simscale helps our consulting engineering company perform on a different level. It has given our Mechanical HVAC division a new niche in engineering \& design. > > **Minpunten**: The ability to simulate more than one material. > > Its a monster program that once tamed, it can be a valuable tool. ----- ### "Excellent platform" — 5.0/5 > **Ajay Bangalore** | *6 oktober 2016* | Research | Aanbevelingsscore: 10.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: I have tried several simulations - ranging from solid, fluid, particles etc. The platform is extremely well built and robust. I liked that it was extremely easy to use. The aspect I liked the most was that there is a community version that students and learners could use. In addition, I think the professional version serves best for more advanced users who would use simulations for design in a more pronounced manner and on an everyday basis. The forums are extremely helpful and I am really glad regarding the speed at which one receives replies both from the people working in the company and also other users. In addition, the blogs and help files definitely make it really easy to use the platform. One of the aspects I also liked is the fact that it is based on open-source codes. So it is not a black box. I could go to openFOAM and check out how things work. The codes are all well parallelized that I have never faced any issues. Issues with parallelization are a general problem in this line of work but with SimScale this was really handy. > > **Minpunten**: There are definitely some aspects where they can improve: 1. Providing structural elements like shells, beams, and plates. Most of the large aspect ratio structures are very time consuming to model using 3D FEM 2. Allow users to use custom material models. Most often, in both industry and academia, we do not use material models given in the software but would like to input our own material model. This is what drives most of the R\&D centres. 3. There are no ad-hoc algorithms that allow hexahedral mesh generation for all geometries. I can think this as one of the reasons why SimScale might not have hexahedral mesh generator. But this can be significantly useful for many applications. > > I have tried several simulations - ranging from solid, fluid, particles etc. The platform is extremely well built and robust. I liked that it was extremely easy to use. The aspect I liked the most was that there is a community version that students and learners could use. In addition, I think the professional version serves best for more advanced users who would use simulations for design in a more pronounced manner and on an everyday basis. The forums are extremely helpful and I am really glad regarding the speed at which one receives replies both from the people working in the company and also other users. In addition, the blogs and help files definitely make it really easy to use the platform. One of the aspects I also liked is the fact that it is based on open-source codes. So it is not a black box. I could go to openFOAM and check out how things work. The codes are all well parallelized that I have never faced any issues. Issues with parallelization are a general problem in this line of work but with SimScale this was really handy. There are definitely some aspects where they can improve: 1. Providing structural elements like shells, beams, and plates. Most of the large aspect ratio structures are very time consuming to model using 3D FEM 2. Allow users to use custom material models. Most often, in both industry and academia, we do not use material models given in the software but would like to input our own material model. This is what drives most of the R\&D centres. 3. There are no ad-hoc algorithms that allow hexahedral mesh generation for all geometries. I can think this as one of the reasons why SimScale might not have hexahedral mesh generator. But this can be significantly useful for many applications. I am sure this is a platform with great potential for the future \& I will look forward to upcoming features. ----- ### "Sharing the Experience working on Simscale" — 4.0/5 > **Mehar** | *30 juli 2023* | Architectuur en planning | Aanbevelingsscore: 8.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: I liked the most - It's navigator form, which makes it easy to learn and use this software. Other software, u need to have your own checklist to do the simulation in a correct way, one thing is missed, whole simulated results will be wasted. here, in Simscale , due to it's navigator form, u don't need to worry about the checklist. in addition to this feature, i liked how fast we can get the simulation done , generally CFD simulations are taking time but here in simscale , u can have your results ready within some hours. That is fantastic. > > **Minpunten**: Yes, sometime as user i feel that i am not able to fix the simulation file/model when it is failing to run and i have to take help from customer support. Getting help from customer support is good but i want to avoid most of the times and want to fix it by myself which i can do easily in other software. for Example, sometime it is showing "error is encountered" but not showing the actual problem. Yes, as an user, i would like to suggest simscale to work on this point and also provide us the easiness to fix the errors/issue coming by ourselves when the run is failed. > > Mostly we are using simscale for Thermal Comfort CFD simulations and outdoor cooling applications. So far, it is useful for us and helps us to achieve the project objectives. ----- Pagina: 1 / 7\ Volgende: [Volgende pagina](https://www.getapp.be/software/105393/simscale?page=2) ## Links - [Bekijk op GetApp](https://www.getapp.be/software/105393/simscale) ## Deze pagina is beschikbaar in de volgende talen | Locatie | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Gestructureerde gegevens